Verbal Working Memory as an Underlying Cognitive Mechanism of Reading Comprehension: A Critical Review of the Evidence and Challenges for Ecuadorian Basic Education

Main Article Content

Delia Pilar Bimbela Suárez
Miurca Gissela Ortega Sánchez
Flor Elizabeth Yépez Bobadilla

Abstract

This article critically analyzes the scientific evidence on the relationship between verbal working memory and reading comprehension among students in Basic General Education from the perspective of cognitive psychology. A critical literature review with a qualitative approach was conducted, supported by a systematic process of searching, selecting, organizing, and thematically analyzing scientific literature published in the Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, APA PsycINFO, and SciELO databases, complemented by technical reports from international organizations. The review includes empirical studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and theoretical contributions published between 2015 and 2026, as well as seminal works considered fundamental references in the field. Convergences, divergences, and knowledge gaps regarding the role of verbal working memory as an underlying cognitive mechanism of reading comprehension were identified. The findings indicate that this system constitutes one of the most consistent cognitive predictors of reading performance, facilitating the processing, temporary storage, and integration of textual information in interaction with executive functions, attention, vocabulary, prior knowledge, and metacognition. Furthermore, the review reveals limited scientific production in the Ecuadorian context, characterized predominantly by descriptive and correlational studies, highlighting the need to develop longitudinal and experimental research that strengthens the understanding of these processes and guides the design of evidence-based pedagogical interventions aimed at improving reading competencies in Basic General Education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Artículos

Author Biographies

Delia Pilar Bimbela Suárez, Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador

Licenciada en Educación Básica por la Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo. Actualmente se desempeña como docente en la Unidad Educativa Fiscal Esperanza Caputi Olvera. Su experiencia profesional se centra en el ámbito educativo, con especial interés en la psicología cognitiva, la comprensión lectora, las funciones ejecutivas y los procesos de aprendizaje en Educación General Básica.

Miurca Gissela Ortega Sánchez, Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador

Magíster en Educación General Básica por la Universidad Estatal de Bolívar. Ejerce funciones de directora en la Unidad Educativa Fiscal Esperanza Caputi Olvera, donde desarrolla actividades vinculadas a la enseñanza y al acompañamiento pedagógico. Sus líneas de interés académico incluyen la memoria de trabajo, la comprensión lectora, la neuroeducación y los procesos cognitivos relacionados con el aprendizaje escolar.

Flor Elizabeth Yépez Bobadilla, Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador

Magíster en Educación Básica por la Universidad Estatal de Milagro. Forma parte de la Unidad Educativa Fiscal Esperanza Caputi Olvera y cuenta con experiencia en el ámbito de la Educación General Básica. Sus intereses investigativos se orientan hacia el estudio de las funciones ejecutivas, la psicología cognitiva y el desarrollo de estrategias pedagógicas fundamentadas en evidencia científica

How to Cite

Bimbela Suárez, D. P., Ortega Sánchez, M. G., & Yépez Bobadilla, F. E. (2026). Verbal Working Memory as an Underlying Cognitive Mechanism of Reading Comprehension: A Critical Review of the Evidence and Challenges for Ecuadorian Basic Education. DISCE. Revista Científica Educativa Y Social, 3(2), 141-168. https://doi.org/10.69821/DISCE.v3i2.126

References

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. En K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). Academic Press.

Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2

Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422

Baddeley, A. D. (2020). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 85, 105984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.105984

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. En G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). Academic Press.

Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31

Cowan, N. (2017). The many faces of working memory and short-term storage. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(4), 1158–1170. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1191 6

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750

Follmer, D. J. (2018). Executive function and reading comprehension: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 53(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1309295

Gathercole, S. E., & Alloway, T. P. (2008). Working memory and learning: A practical guide for teachers. SAGE Publications.

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa. (2022). La educación en Ecuador: Logros y desafíos para la mejora de los aprendizajes. INEVAL.

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Readers of the 21st century: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). PISA 2022 insights and interpretations. OECD Publishing.

Peng, P., Barnes, M., Wang, C., Wang, W., Li, S., Swanson, H. L., Dardick, W., & Tao, S. (2018). A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000124

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Swanson, H. L., & O'Connor, R. E. (2009). The role of working memory and fluency practice on the reading comprehension of students who are dysfluent readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(6), 548–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409338742

Swanson, H. L., Zheng, X., & Jerman, O. (2009). Working memory, short-term memory, and reading disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(3), 260–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409331958

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Cognitive load theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4

UNESCO & Laboratorio Latinoamericano de Evaluación de la Calidad de la Educación (LLECE). (2021). Estudio Regional Comparativo y Explicativo (ERCE 2019): Reporte de resultados. Oficina Regional de Educación para América Latina y el Caribe (OREALC/UNESCO Santiago).

United Nations Children's Fund. (2024). Recovering learning: Are children and youth on track? UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/education

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2019). ERCE 2019: Reporte regional de resultados. Factores asociados. Oficina Regional de Educación para América Latina y el Caribe (OREALC/UNESCO Santiago).

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2024). Education transforms lives. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/education

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2024). Global education monitoring report 2024/25: Leadership in education. UNESCO Publishing. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report

Vernucci, S., Zamora, E., & Richards, M. M. (2021). Working memory and reading comprehension in school-age children: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1587–1616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09616-4

Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why don't students like school? A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. Jossey-Bass.

World Bank. (2024). The state of global learning poverty: 2024 update. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/brief/what-is-learning-poverty

World Bank, UNESCO, & UNICEF. (2021). The state of the global education crisis: A path to recovery. World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.